• Call Us+91 7388255933
  • Email Uslawgiconivisam@gmail.com
LaWGiCo
  • Home
  • Law Updates
    • PIL is not maintainable in service matters: Supreme Court
  • About Us
  • Features
  • FAQ
  • Contact Us
Login Register

Punjab & Haryana High Court Reduces Compensation in ₹77 Lakh Motor Accident Award; Excludes Family Pension from Deceased’s Income

Punjab & Haryana High Court Reduces Compensation in ₹77 Lakh Motor Accident Award; Excludes Family Pension from Deceased’s Income

Case Name: ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Priya P.S. & Others
Date of Judgment: October 29, 2025
Citation: FAO-5779-2025
Bench: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Parmod Goyal

Held: The Punjab & Haryana High Court partly allowed ICICI Lombard’s appeal against a ₹77,24,440 compensation award passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Kurukshetra, in favour of the dependents of deceased Satheesh Kumar. Justice Parmod Goyal held that the Tribunal erred in computing loss of dependency by wrongly taking the deceased’s age as 40 years instead of 41 years and by including family pension as part of his income. The Court clarified that family pension received by dependents cannot be treated as the deceased’s income for compensation computation. Accordingly, the compensation was recalculated on the basis of notional income under the “highly skilled” category and reduced to ₹21,43,000 with interest at 7.5% per annum.

Summary: The deceased, Satheesh Kumar, an ex-Air Force personnel, died in a road accident on October 2, 2020, involving a Bolero vehicle. His dependents were awarded ₹77,24,440 by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal. The insurance company challenged the award on grounds of incorrect age, excessive multiplier, wrongful addition of future prospects, and inclusion of pension in income. The Court found that the deceased’s age was 41 years and 6 months, warranting a multiplier of 14 instead of 15, and held that pension cannot be added as income, though it cannot be deducted either. Citing Vishavjit Singh v. Cholamandalam Insurance Co. and Sarla Verma v. DTC, the Court reaffirmed that family pension is not related to the cause of death and thus cannot enhance the dependency loss. The recalculated compensation, including consortium and funeral expenses, totaled ₹21,43,000 — a reduction of ₹55,81,440 from the Tribunal’s award.

Decision: The Court reduced the compensation from ₹77,24,440 to ₹21,43,000, payable with 7.5% annual interest from the filing date of the claim petition till realization. The appeal was accordingly allowed in part.

Click here to Read/Download the Order

If You Need Any Help Contact LaWGiCo

+91 7388255933

Contact us today!

image

Whether you’re a litigant, a legal counsel, or a corporation — LaWGiCo bridges the gap between law and accessibility.

Quick Links

  • Home
  • Features
  • FAQ
  • Law Updates
  • Contact Us

Resources

  • About us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms & Conditions

Contact us

268 GR FLR HIMSHIKHA COLONY PANCHKULA C.R.P.F. Pinjore Panchkula Haryana India 134104

+91 7388255933

lawgiconivisam@gmail.com

Open Time

Opening Day:
Monday - Friday: 8am to 6pm
Saturday: 9am to 5pm

Vacation:
All Sunday's

Copyright © 2025 LaWGiCo | All Rights Reserved