• Call Us+91 7388255933
  • Email Uslawgiconivisam@gmail.com
LaWGiCo
  • Home
  • Law Updates
    • PIL is not maintainable in service matters: Supreme Court
  • Publications
  • About Us
  • Features
  • FAQ
  • Contact Us
Login Register

Unsuccessful Party Can Seek Interim Relief Under Section 9 Post-Award: Supreme Court Resolves Conflicting High Court Views

Unsuccessful Party Can Seek Interim Relief Under Section 9 Post-Award: Supreme Court Resolves Conflicting High Court Views

ase Name: Home Care Retail Marts Pvt. Ltd. v. Haresh N. Sanghavi
Citation: 2026 INSC 415
Date of Judgment/Order: April 24, 2026
Bench: Justice Manoj Misra and Justice Manmohan

Held: The Supreme Court held that an unsuccessful party in arbitral proceedings is not barred from seeking interim measures under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 at the post-award stage before enforcement of the award. It clarified that the expression “a party” under Section 9 includes all parties to the arbitration agreement, irrespective of the outcome of the arbitration, and cannot be restrictively interpreted to mean only a successful party.

Summary: The case addressed a significant conflict among High Courts regarding whether a party that has lost in arbitration can seek interim relief under Section 9 after an award is rendered. While some High Courts had denied such relief on the ground that interim measures post-award are meant only to protect the “fruits of the award,” others had allowed such applications. The Supreme Court examined the statutory language, scheme, and purpose of Section 9 and held that it expressly permits any party to seek interim protection before, during, and after arbitration until enforcement of the award. The Court rejected restrictive interpretations adopted in judgments like Dirk India and held that such readings impermissibly rewrite the statute. It emphasized that Section 9 operates independently of Sections 34 and 36, which deal with challenge and enforcement of awards, and that denying relief would leave an unsuccessful party remediless in appropriate cases. The Court also noted that modern jurisprudence permits modification of arbitral awards and that interim relief may be necessary to preserve the subject matter pending challenge proceedings.

Decision: The Supreme Court held that unsuccessful parties are entitled to invoke Section 9 at the post-award stage, overruled contrary High Court judgments, upheld the broader interpretation of the provision, disposed of one appeal, and directed listing of connected appeals for further hearing, with all pending applications disposed of.

Click here to Read/Download the Order

If You Need Any Help Contact LaWGiCo

+91 7388255933

Contact us today!

image

Whether you’re a litigant, a legal counsel, or a corporation — LaWGiCo bridges the gap between law and accessibility.

Quick Links

  • Home
  • Features
  • FAQ
  • Law Updates
  • Contact Us

Resources

  • About us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms & Conditions

Contact us

268 GR FLR HIMSHIKHA COLONY PANCHKULA C.R.P.F. Pinjore Panchkula Haryana India 134104

+91 7388255933

lawgiconivisam@gmail.com

Open Time

Opening Day:
Monday - Friday: 8am to 6pm
Saturday: 9am to 5pm

Vacation:
All Sunday's

Copyright © 2025 LaWGiCo | All Rights Reserved