• Call Us+91 7388255933
  • Email Uslawgiconivisam@gmail.com
LaWGiCo
  • Home
  • Law Updates
    • PIL is not maintainable in service matters: Supreme Court
  • About Us
  • Features
  • FAQ
  • Contact Us
Login Register

Punjab and Haryana High Court – CBSE Directed to Correct Date of Birth in Secondary School Certificate

Punjab and Haryana High Court – CBSE Directed to Correct Date of Birth in Secondary School Certificate

Case Name: Ropin Hastir @ Robin Sharma v. Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE) and others

Citation: CWP No. 20494 of 2018

Date of Judgment: 7 January 2020

Bench: Justice Sudhir Mittal

Held: The Punjab and Haryana High Court allowed the writ petition and directed the CBSE to correct the petitioner’s date of birth in his Secondary School Certificate. The Court held that Rule 69.3 of the CBSE Examination Rules permitted correction where school records supported the claim, and in this case the error originated from an incorrect transfer certificate later rectified by the school. Pleas of res judicata, estoppel, and delay were rejected in light of the supporting records and continuous pursuit of remedies by the petitioner.

Summary: The petitioner’s date of birth was wrongly recorded as 22.07.1996 in his Secondary School Certificate based on a transfer certificate issued by Police DAV Public School in 2011. His actual date of birth, as per the birth certificate and other official documents, was 25.07.1996. Earlier, his representation was rejected, and a writ petition (CWP No. 20834 of 2014) was dismissed under Rule 69.2, which then permitted only clerical corrections. A subsequent civil suit filed in 2015 was withdrawn.

In 2018, after the school issued a fresh transfer certificate with the correct date, the CBSE again refused correction. The petitioner challenged this decision.

The High Court found that multiple records, including the birth certificate, registration forms, and the corrected transfer certificate, supported the claim. The error clearly arose from the earlier transfer certificate. Thus, the case fell within Rule 69.3. The Court further held that the earlier dismissal did not operate as res judicata since key documents were not before the Court then, and withdrawal of the civil suit did not bar the writ. The judgment in Ambika Kaul v. CBSE (2015) was distinguished, as that case involved estoppel before superannuation, unlike the petitioner’s situation.

Decision: The writ petition was allowed. CBSE was directed to correct the date of birth in the petitioner’s certificate within four weeks of receiving the certified copy of the judgment.

Click here to Read/Download the Order

If You Need Any Help Contact LaWGiCo

+91 7388255933

Contact us today!

image

Whether you’re a litigant, a legal counsel, or a corporation — LaWGiCo bridges the gap between law and accessibility.

Quick Links

  • Home
  • Features
  • FAQ
  • Law Updates
  • Contact Us

Resources

  • About us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms & Conditions

Contact us

268 GR FLR HIMSHIKHA COLONY PANCHKULA C.R.P.F. Pinjore Panchkula Haryana India 134104

+91 7388255933

lawgiconivisam@gmail.com

Open Time

Opening Day:
Monday - Friday: 8am to 6pm
Saturday: 9am to 5pm

Vacation:
All Sunday's

Copyright © 2025 LaWGiCo | All Rights Reserved

Design by: H T Logics PVT. LTD