• Call Us+91 7388255933
  • Email Uslawgiconivisam@gmail.com
LaWGiCo
  • Home
  • Law Updates
    • PIL is not maintainable in service matters: Supreme Court
  • About Us
  • Features
  • FAQ
  • Contact Us
Login Register

Punjab & Haryana HC: Specific performance decreed after 38 years—Subsequent purchasers during lis pendens not protected

Punjab & Haryana HC: Specific performance decreed after 38 years—Subsequent purchasers during lis pendens not protected

Case Name: Waryam Singh Lambardar (through LRs) v. Gurbax Singh & Ors.
Date of Judgment: January 9, 2020
Citation: RSA No. 983 of 1988
Bench: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amol Rattan Singh

Held: The High Court restored the trial court’s decree of specific performance of an agreement to sell agricultural land, reversing the first appellate court’s denial of possession. It held that the plaintiff was always ready and willing to perform his part, while the defendant sought an additional sum beyond the agreed rate without any written contract. Any such oral arrangement to avoid stamp duty was unenforceable under Sections 23–24 of the Contract Act. Subsequent purchasers who bought the land during pendency of litigation could not claim protection, as the principle of lis pendens under Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act applied.

Summary: The plaintiff, Waryam Singh, entered into an agreement on 10.04.1981 with the defendant for sale of 7 kanals 13 marlas at ₹21,000 per acre. He paid ₹5,600 earnest money and remained ready to complete the sale. On 03.07.1981/09.07.1981 both parties appeared before the Sub-Registrar, but the defendant refused unless an additional ₹4,800 was paid. The trial court decreed specific performance, but the first appellate court reversed it, limiting relief to refund of earnest money with interest. In second appeal, the High Court found the appellate reasoning perverse as there was no evidence of revised consideration, and oral settlements to defeat stamp duty were void. It also held that subsequent purchasers from 1986, impleaded in 2014, could not escape the decree as they were either aware of the pending litigation or deemed bound by lis pendens. Given the appellants’ diligence in prosecuting the case, delay could not defeat their rights.

Decision: Appeal allowed. Trial court decree restored. Plaintiffs entitled to specific performance, subject to paying the subsequent purchasers the consideration mentioned in their 1986 sale deed with 9% interest from that date, within 4 months.

Click here to Read/Download the Order

If You Need Any Help Contact LaWGiCo

+91 7388255933

Contact us today!

image

Whether you’re a litigant, a legal counsel, or a corporation — LaWGiCo bridges the gap between law and accessibility.

Quick Links

  • Home
  • Features
  • FAQ
  • Law Updates
  • Contact Us

Resources

  • About us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms & Conditions

Contact us

268 GR FLR HIMSHIKHA COLONY PANCHKULA C.R.P.F. Pinjore Panchkula Haryana India 134104

+91 7388255933

lawgiconivisam@gmail.com

Open Time

Opening Day:
Monday - Friday: 8am to 6pm
Saturday: 9am to 5pm

Vacation:
All Sunday's

Copyright © 2025 LaWGiCo | All Rights Reserved

Design by: H T Logics PVT. LTD